PESQUISA VETERINÁRIA BRASILEIRA

Abstract in English:

ABSTRACT.- Schaefer R., Rech R.R., Silva M.C., Gava D. & Ciacci-Zanella J.R. 2013. [Guidelines for diagnosis of swine influenza.] Orientações para o diagnóstico de influenza em suínos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 33(1):61-73.Embrapa Suínos e Aves, BR 153 Km 110, Concórdia, SC 89700-000, Brazil. E-mail: rejane.schaefer@embrapa.br This article is intended to describe the adequate sample collection, the laboratory procedures/techniques, the expected results and their interpretation for diagnosis of influenza infection in swine, serving as a support for field veterinarians. In live pigs, the samples to be taken are nasal secretions, oral fluids and blood. For dead pigs, preference should be given to samples of cranioventral lung consolidation. Nasal discharge and chilled lung fragments are used for detection of virus (virus isolation - VI) or viral nucleic acids (conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR). Samples should not be frozen, because the virus is inactivated at -20°C. Molecular characterization of isolates is performed by phylogenetic analysis of gene sequences obtained by DNA sequencing. Serum is used for the detection of antibodies using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test and ELISA. Oral fluid may be used for either antibody (ELISA) or viral detection. Fragments of lung fixed in 10% formaldehyde are used for histopathological analysis to identify bronchointerstitial pneumonia, and for immunohistochemistry (IHC) for antigens. For a successful diagnosis, sampling should be preferably performed in the acute phase of the disease to improve chances of virus detection. The best options to perform the diagnosis of influenza A in a swine herd are RT-PCR and VI from nasal swabs or oral fluid in live pigs and/or lung tissue for RT-PCR, VI or IHC in dead pigs. Serological tests are of very limited diagnostic value and are useful only to determine the immune status of the herd, not indicating clinical disease, because antibodies are detected after 7-10 days post infection (subacute phase). The diagnosis of influenza is important to evaluate the involvement of this agent in the complex of respiratory diseases in pigs. Furthermore, the isolation of influenza virus is essential for monitoring the main subtypes circulating in a given region or country, as well as for the detection of potential new viral reassortants, because influenza is considered a zoonosis.

• Influenza A virus sampling respiratory diseases vírus influenza A colheita de amostras doenças respiratórias

Abstract in Portuguese:

RESUMO.- Schaefer R., Rech R.R., Silva M.C., Gava D. & Ciacci-Zanella J.R. 2013. [Guidelines for diagnosis of swine influenza.] Orientações para o diagnóstico de influenza em suínos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 33(1):61-73.Embrapa Suínos e Aves, BR 153 Km 110, Concórdia, SC 89700-000, Brazil. E-mail: rejane.schaefer@embrapa.br Este trabalho descreve a colheita adequada de amostras, as técnicas/procedimentos disponíveis para o diagnóstico de influenza A em suínos, assim como os resultados e suas respectivas interpretações, para auxiliar médicos veterinários de campo na identificação dessa doença. Em suínos vivos, as amostras adequadas são: secreção nasal, fluido oral e sangue (soro). Para suínos mortos, colher preferencialmente amostras de pulmão com consolidação cranioventral. Secreção nasal e fragmentos de pulmão refrigerado são utilizados para detectar partícula viral viável (isolamento viral - IV) ou ácido nucleico viral (RT-PCR convencional e RT-PCR em tempo real). As amostras não devem ser congeladas, pois o vírus é inativado a -20°C. A caracterização molecular dos isolados é feita pela análise filogenética obtida pelo sequenciamento de DNA. O soro é utilizado para a detecção de anticorpos (Acs) por meio do teste da inibição da hemaglutinação e ELISA. O fluido oral pode ser utilizado para detecção de anticorpo (ELISA) ou de vírus. Fragmentos de pulmão fixados em formol a 10% são examinados microscopicamente para identificar pneumonia broncointersticial e para detecção de antígeno viral pela imuno-histoquímica (IHQ). Para o sucesso do diagnóstico, as amostras devem ser colhidas de suínos que estão preferencialmente na fase aguda da doença, para aumentar as chances de detecção viral. As melhores opções para o diagnóstico de influenza A em suínos vivos são RT-PCR e isolamento viral de amostras de swab nasal ou fluido oral. Pulmão para análise por RT-PCR, isolamento viral ou IHQ é a amostra de escolha em suínos mortos. Testes sorológicos têm valor diagnóstico limitado e são utilizados apenas para determinar o estado imune do rebanho, não indicando doença clínica, pois os Acs são detectados 7-10 dias pós-infecção (fase subaguda). O diagnóstico de influenza é importante para avaliar o envolvimento desse agente no complexo de doença respiratória suína. Além disso, o isolamento do vírus influenza é essencial para o monitoramento dos principais subtipos circulantes em uma determinada região ou país, assim como para a detecção de novos rearranjos virais, já que influenza é considerada uma zoonose.

Abstract in English:

ABSTRACT.- Oliveira Filho J.X., De Paula D.A.J., Morés N., Pescador C.A., Ciacci-Zanella J.R., Coldebella A., Dutra V. & Nakazato L. 2012. Interstitial nephritis of slaughtered pigs inthe State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 32(4):303-318. Laboratório de Microbiologia Veterinária e Biologia Molecular, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, MT 78060-900, Brazil. E-mail: lucnak@ufmt.br This study evaluated histological lesions in kidney samples from pigs with nephritis in two slaughterhouses in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Four hundred samples were subjected to histology, anti-porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) immunohistochemistry (IHC), anti-Leptospira sp. immunofluorescence (IF), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for PCV2, porcine parvovirus (PPV), and Torque teno virus type 1 and 2 (TTV1, TTV2) detection. Histological lesions were found in 81% of the samples, and mononuclear interstitial nephritis was the most frequent lesion (77.50%). A follicular pattern was observed in 40.97% of the interstitial nephritis lesions. PCV2, PPV, TTV1, and TTV2 were identified in the kidneys by PCR in 27.25%, 28.50%, 94%, and 87.5% of the samples, respectively. Leptospira sp. was not detected through IF. Infection by PCV2 (PCR) and the presence of histological lesions (P=0.008) and giant cells (P=0.0016) were significantly associated. An association was observed between the TTV2-TTV1 co-infection (P<0.0001) and the risk for pathogenesis. These findings indicated that PCV2, PPV, TTV1, and TTV2 were widely distributed among pigs in the local farms and that the presence of these agents should be considered in the differential diagnosis of kidneys with interstitial nephritis in pigs.

• Nephritis porcine circovirus type 2 nefrite intersticial circovirus suíno tipo 2

Abstract in Portuguese:

RESUMO.- Oliveira Filho J.X., De Paula D.A.J., Morés N., Pescador C.A., Ciacci-Zanella J.R., Coldebella A., Dutra V. & Nakazato L. 2012. Interstitial nephritis of slaughtered pigs inthe State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 32(4):303-318. Laboratório de Microbiologia Veterinária e Biologia Molecular, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, MT 78060-900, Brazil. E-mail: lucnak@ufmt.br O propósito desse estudo foi avaliar as lesões histológicas observadas em rins condenados por nefrite pelo Serviço de Inspeção Federal, em dois frigoríficos de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Foram coletados 400 rins condenados por nefrite e submetidos aos exames de histologia, imuno-histoquímica (IHC) para Circovirus suíno Tipo 2 (PCV2), imunofluorescência direta (IF) para Leptospira sp. e reação em cadeia pela polimerase (PCR) para detecção de PCV2, Parvovirus suíno (PPV) e Torque teno vírus Tipo 1 e 2 (TTV1 e TTV2). Foram observadas lesões histológicas em 81% das amostras, sendo nefrite intersticial mononuclear a mais freqüente (77,50%). Das lesões de nefrite intersticial encontradas, 40,97% apresentaram padrão folicular. Através da PCR foi observada ampla distribuição dos agentes (PCV2, PPV, TTV1 e TTV2) nas propriedades e municípios, com ocorrência de 27,25%, 28,50%, 94% e 87,50%, respectivamente. Leptospira sp. não foi detectada através da IF. Houve associação significativa da infecção do PCV2 com presença de lesão histológica (P=0,008) e de células gigantes (P=0,0016). Também houve associação entre a co-infecção TTV2 e TTV1 (P<0,0001). Esses achados indicam que os vírus PCV2, PPV, TTV1 e TTV2 devem ser considerados no diagnóstico diferencial de rins com nefrite intersticial em suínos.

Abstract in English:

ABSTRACT.- Gava D., Zanella E.L., Morés N. & Ciacci-Zanella J.R. 2008. Transmission of porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) by semen and viral distribution in different piglet tissues. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 28(1):70-76. Laboratório de Virologia, Embrapa Suínos e Aves, BR 153 Km 110, Vila Tamanduá, Cx. Postal 21, Concórdia, SC 89700-000, Brazil. E-mail: janice@cnpsa.embrapa.br Porcine circovirus infections are caused by the porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2). Among six different clinical manifestations involving respiratory, enteric, nervous and reproductive signs, the postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) is the most important and studied disease. However, reproductive failures associated with PCV2 have been increasingly reported. Some studies have shown the possible contamination of sows by semen of PCV2 positive boars. In order to investigate the transmission of PCV2 by contaminated semen and its ability to infect the sow and piglets, 20 PCV2 negative sows were inseminated, 10 with negative boar semen and 10 with previously nested-PCR tested positive boar semen. The sows were weekly monitored and blood samples were collected. Based on the results, 4 out 20 sows were selected (1 sow was PCR negative and inseminated with a negative semen, 2 sows were PCR negative and inseminated with a positive semen and 1 sow was PCR negative and inseminated with a positive semen, but became PCR positive around the 30 days of pregnancy). After weaning, 12 male piglets, 3 of each sow, were selected and maintained under isolation. In order to investigate which organs harbored the virus, the young pigs were necropsied around 9 months of age. Samples of serum collected monthly were tested by immunocitochemistry (ICC), and all 12 pigs serum converted. Samples of lymphoid, systemic and reproductive organs were analyzed by nested-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Evaluation of the samples by nested-PCR, revealed that several tissues were positive in 10 of 12 pigs, mainly the lymph nodes, bone marrow and spleen. Various samples were positive by IHC in 8 of 12 piglets, being the lymph nodes, tonsils and bulbourethral glands the most frequently positive. Thus, the results of testing different samples, in the 3 tests (ICC, nested-PCR and IHC) were complementary. These results show that PCV2 transmission through semen to the sows and piglets may occur and may also represent a potential risk for the herd.

• Swine PCV2 semen transmission immunohistochemistry PCR

Abstract in Portuguese:

ABSTRACT.- Gava D., Zanella E.L., Morés N. & Ciacci-Zanella J.R. 2008. Transmission of porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) by semen and viral distribution in different piglet tissues. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 28(1):70-76. Laboratório de Virologia, Embrapa Suínos e Aves, BR 153 Km 110, Vila Tamanduá, Cx. Postal 21, Concórdia, SC 89700-000, Brazil. E-mail: janice@cnpsa.embrapa.br Porcine circovirus infections are caused by the porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2). Among six different clinical manifestations involving respiratory, enteric, nervous and reproductive signs, the postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) is the most important and studied disease. However, reproductive failures associated with PCV2 have been increasingly reported. Some studies have shown the possible contamination of sows by semen of PCV2 positive boars. In order to investigate the transmission of PCV2 by contaminated semen and its ability to infect the sow and piglets, 20 PCV2 negative sows were inseminated, 10 with negative boar semen and 10 with previously nested-PCR tested positive boar semen. The sows were weekly monitored and blood samples were collected. Based on the results, 4 out 20 sows were selected (1 sow was PCR negative and inseminated with a negative semen, 2 sows were PCR negative and inseminated with a positive semen and 1 sow was PCR negative and inseminated with a positive semen, but became PCR positive around the 30 days of pregnancy). After weaning, 12 male piglets, 3 of each sow, were selected and maintained under isolation. In order to investigate which organs harbored the virus, the young pigs were necropsied around 9 months of age. Samples of serum collected monthly were tested by immunocitochemistry (ICC), and all 12 pigs serum converted. Samples of lymphoid, systemic and reproductive organs were analyzed by nested-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Evaluation of the samples by nested-PCR, revealed that several tissues were positive in 10 of 12 pigs, mainly the lymph nodes, bone marrow and spleen. Various samples were positive by IHC in 8 of 12 piglets, being the lymph nodes, tonsils and bulbourethral glands the most frequently positive. Thus, the results of testing different samples, in the 3 tests (ICC, nested-PCR and IHC) were complementary. These results show that PCV2 transmission through semen to the sows and piglets may occur and may also represent a potential risk for the herd.